Non-ownership based Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:46:01 -0700 (MST) |
Your community is an exception, not the rule. From my understanding and learning, the large majority (80%?)of other cohousing groups are setup as private ownership models. Certainly that is the case in the US, and much of Denmark. There are probably more examples of non-ownership cohousing in the non-USA. I know of none in the US currently, although I certainly don't know all the situations. There was a small subsidized project in Chicago, but I believe that was also home ownership model. I would be interested to hear of any non-ownership based cohousing in the US, not including privately owned units that are rented, or subleased. I have not heard of a single US project that is setup for non-ownership. I have heard of 2-3 preliminary attempts at such a thing, all of which failed. Rob Sandelin -----Original Message----- From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org [mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf Of Robyn Williams Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 3:27 PM To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Subject: Re: [C-L]_Co housing for the working class Hi Rob et al > Cohousing is based on private home ownership. That's a new one on me, Rob. Could you explain it further please? I believe that cohousing is simply a socio-design concept, to 'build' community. Literally. It may be more straightforward to finance the houses individually, but it's not a more legitimate form of cohousing. Again, I'll draw this list's attention to Pinakarri Community, a cohousing project that was initiated and primarily developed by low-income tenants who manage the property co-operatively. The intention attracted some people with their own capital. We ended up with eight 'subsidised' rental, four privately owned houses, and of course our commonhouse, on site. We now have three more neighbouring , privately owned houses, and two neighbouring private rentals. I'm currently working with two new low-income rental/private equity groups for whom the cohousing concept is suitable. Inspired by Pinakarri's example, several other rental co-ops in WA are 'converting' to cohousing style by finding a way to include a commonhouse. One co-op has recently converted a rental house into a commonhouse, others are fund-raising. The low-income rental co-op sector in Western Australia was fortunate to have had the involvement of an architect who promoted cohousing at its inception. Why constrain the concept? > But it takes dedication and work, nobody will do it for you. It's true. I suggest that any group which is interested in affordable rental, attract people who are motivated to be rent paying members. Warm regards Robyn Williams Pinakarri Community Fremantle, Western Australia pov [at] iinet.net.au Co-op Development Officer Community Housing Coalition WA Robyn [at] chcwa.com.au _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Co housing for the working class Robert Waldrop, March 4 2002
-
Re: Co housing for the working class Dahako, March 5 2002
-
RE: Co housing for the working class Rob Sandelin, March 5 2002
- Re: Co housing for the working class Robyn Williams, March 7 2002
- Non-ownership based Cohousing Rob Sandelin, March 8 2002
- Re: Non-ownership based Cohousing Fred H Olson, March 8 2002
- Re: Non-ownership based Cohousing Robert P. Arjet, March 8 2002
- RE: Non-ownership based Cohousing: capital requirements Rob Sandelin, March 10 2002
- Re: Non-ownership based Cohousing Kay Argyle, March 11 2002
-
RE: Co housing for the working class Rob Sandelin, March 5 2002
-
Re: Co housing for the working class Dahako, March 5 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.