Consensus and Accountability | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 07:37:01 -0700 (MST) |
> tIn a group where individuals can stop the group, but not be > held accountable to the group, consensus process no longer functions. > > So, if you don't have a voting backup, you should at least have in place a > process that holds the blocker somehow accountable to the group. Otherwise, > blocking becomes a means of getting my way, and if that's all I care about, > then the community suffers and consensus is out the window. Can you say more about accountability and being held accountable to the group? How does this work in practical terms in a just forming group, a group that is in the construction phase, shortly after move in, etc. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- RE: Voting backup, (continued)
-
RE: Voting backup Rob Sandelin, March 31 2002
- Re: RE: Voting backup Robert P. Arjet, March 31 2002
- Re: RE: Voting backup Ann Zabaldo, April 1 2002
- Re: RE: Voting backup Sharon Villines, April 1 2002
- Consensus and Accountability Sharon Villines, April 1 2002
-
RE: Voting backup Rob Sandelin, March 31 2002
- Re: Consensus and the Concept of Blocking Gary Kent, April 2 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.