RE: Voting backup | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 22:01:01 -0700 (MST) |
One point which I think may have been missed is that sometimes people join cohousing groups who have little or no interest in being cooperative. Also, occasionally groups get stuck with a member who has severe dysfunctionality. These type of people have held groups decision making hostage by blocking all decisions. I used to fly around the country trying to help groups out of these kinds of messes, and saw lots of examples of this kind of thing. In all the cases, having a back up voting process would have fixed the problem about being held hostage. It is great when ALL the members of a group support the best interests of the group. However, this is sometimes not the case, and in my observation, cohousing in particular seems to have trouble with this. People come in to cohousing groups with a wide variety of interest and support in cooperation. Sometimes this leads to real problems trying to use consensus as a decision process. People who have little interest in being cooperative don't want to spend the time it takes. Here is another scenario that is not uncommon. A person says about a pre-forming proposal: I would block that. This statement can be done on purpose, in order to kill the proposal before it starts, and to intimidate the proposers. In a group where individuals can stop the group, but not be held accountable to the group, consensus process no longer functions. So, if you don't have a voting backup, you should at least have in place a process that holds the blocker somehow accountable to the group. Otherwise, blocking becomes a means of getting my way, and if that's all I care about, then the community suffers and consensus is out the window. Rob Sandelin Sky Valley Environments: Nature is our classroom www.sharingwood.com --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
RE: Consensus and the Concept of Blocking Mccourt, Eileen, March 28 2002
-
Re: Consensus and the Concept of Blocking Becky Schaller, March 29 2002
- RE: Voting backup Rob Sandelin, March 31 2002
- Re: RE: Voting backup Robert P. Arjet, March 31 2002
- Re: RE: Voting backup Ann Zabaldo, April 1 2002
- Re: RE: Voting backup Sharon Villines, April 1 2002
- Consensus and Accountability Sharon Villines, April 1 2002
-
Re: Consensus and the Concept of Blocking Becky Schaller, March 29 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.