Re: Seeing-eye dogs and common house pet policies | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (jnpalme![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 21:06:31 -0600 (MDT) |
In <20020325175908.6A2192C926 [at] lightship.internal.homeport.org>, on 03/25/2002 at 12:59 PM, catya [at] homeport.org (Catya Belfer-Shevett) said: >> If I can add to the question. Has any community had to face a situation >> where you had a service dog and a dog-allergic member? >We're not up and running, but my feeling is that unless you had a >serious unmedicable allergy, the service dog would take precedence. I think that Katya is right in the sense that people see blindness as a form of disability, but they don't see people with allergies or multiple chemical sensitivities as disabled. Yet, allowing a dog in a space might make it inaccessible for someone who is highly sensitized. I'm not choosing who is "right" or "wrong" on this one, I'm just pointing out that we are conditioned, culturally, to opt for one over the other. R. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Seeing-eye dogs and common house pet policies Diane Simpson, March 23 2002
- Re: Seeing-eye dogs and common house pet policies Sharon Villines, March 23 2002
-
Re: Seeing-eye dogs and common house pet policies Jeanne Goodman, March 25 2002
-
Re: Seeing-eye dogs and common house pet policies Catya Belfer-Shevett, March 25 2002
- Re: Seeing-eye dogs and common house pet policies Racheli Gai, April 15 2002
- RE: Seeing-eye dogs and common house pet policies Catya Belfer-Shevett, April 16 2002
-
Re: Seeing-eye dogs and common house pet policies Catya Belfer-Shevett, March 25 2002
- Re: Seeing-eye dogs and common house pet policies Sharon Villines, March 25 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.