Process & the Spirit of Consensus | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:07:00 -0600 (MDT) |
> "Process can be used to avoid dealing with issues just as easily as to deal > with issues. My favorite at the moment is "Process was followed therefore > you can't question the outcome." This one I would needlepoint into a pillow. If consensus is the objective, why switch the discussion to process? Is there a process that "produces" consensus? Where is the bottom line in "process"? It seems to be more process, not getting to the point of the issue. When did process become the subject instead of the subject? (Rhetorical question.) Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
More Outbursts George Krasle, April 21 2002
- Process & the Spirit of Consensus Sharon Villines, April 21 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.