Re: business vs personal is a misleading dichotomy | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 06:43:09 -0600 (MDT) |
> Profit is a fundamental necessary property of any active entity which > survives in the real world. A plant must gain more energy from a leaf > than it expends on building the leaf, on average, or it shrivels and dies. > An animal must get more from eating something than it costs to find and eat > it, or it starves to death. Even a "non-profit" must bring in more funds > through fund-raising than it spends on doing that fund or it loses > money and cannot function. Thank you for a wonderful explanation of business and profit. When I saw Lynn's post this morning I thought "Do I have the strength to take this on this morning?" The post was a beautifully stated view of business vs social that so many of us operate on all the time. One of the problems is the word "profit" has taken on a negative slant as in "taking more than you need," making soap for $1 and selling it for $10, and becoming a millionaire while all your workers are dying from the manufacturing process. Another word for profit would be helpful to refocus the dialogue. What salaried people forget is that salaries are profits. Technically they are defined differently (for tax purposes, etc.) but for a small business owner, no profit means no salary. My daughter recently returned to college to get an MBA. The entire focus of the very intensive first few months was social skills. Team work, understanding personalities, developing and applying social skills, constant group activities. Understanding yourself -- your abilities and preferences. How do these match different roles taken by business leaders? I began to learn about people and groups when I started reading business texts to run a small business. If you don't understand social groups, you can't run a good business. > Delivering the same value while using less (labor, > resources, energy, ...) is both more profitable and more "ecological". > The alternative is waste. What must be emphasized here is that the workers are part of the resources and energy. it is very bad business to harm your workers. "Sustainable" was a business concept long before it was an ecological concept. A business that can't be sustained is of no value. > But life is not a zero-sum game. Wealth can be created, value > can be created, through intelligence and effort. Knowledge can be > gained and recorded and accumulated over centuries, leading to a > steady progress of civilization. The average American today has a much > longer life expectancy than the Pharaohs of Egypt or the Caesars of Rome, > and is richer in many ways as well. Most entrepreneurs I know think > in terms of growing a bigger pie much more often than they think about how > to slice up a fixed-size one. Thinking of everything in zero-sum terms > is a habit of poverty. Cohousing is an excellent example of creating value. Taking a traditional real estate development model and joining it with a traditional social model, cohousers produce a product that is worth more than its parts. Cohousing is excellent business. > Anyway, to get back to the original topic of emotional outbursts, I think > there are different kinds of meetings where emotions have more or less > relevance. If one is holding a "values discussion", emotional input is > the main purpose of the meeting, and excluding it would be ridiculous. > If one is holding a "business meeting" to discuss finances, it's a lot > less clear that expressing emotions is useful or productive. But here the argument falls back into its own trap. There is no division between "business" and "social" values. Discussing a budget _is_ discussing values. An emotional reaction makes the spreadsheet real. Why even discuss spreadsheets if they have no value to human life? Yes, it is difficult to deal with people who cannot take control of their emotional energies and direct them, but dismissing or labeling those emotions as inappropriate is not helpful either. There are times when emotional "outbursts" are very grounding and very much to the point, particularly in "business" meetings. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: what motivates an outburst/ managing outbursts, (continued)
- Re: what motivates an outburst/ managing outbursts Maggi Rohde, April 18 2002
-
Re: what motivates an outburst/ managing outbursts Cheryl A. Charis-Graves, April 17 2002
-
business vs personal is a misleading dichotomy Kay Argyle, April 19 2002
- Re: business vs personal is a misleading dichotomy Howard Landman, April 20 2002
- Re: business vs personal is a misleading dichotomy Sharon Villines, April 21 2002
- Re: business vs personal is a misleading dichotomy Kay Argyle, April 24 2002
- Re: business vs personal is a misleading dichotomy Sharon Villines, April 24 2002
- cost shifting (business ...) Kay Argyle, April 27 2002
-
business vs personal is a misleading dichotomy Kay Argyle, April 19 2002
- Natural Capital, Social Capital, and Human Economic Survival (was business etc.) Sheila Braun, April 21 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.