RE: Advertising advice | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 06:43:20 -0600 (MDT) |
One of things I am surprised about is that in areas like Seattle, which have several cohousing units for sale, is that the owners of those units don't do some sort of cooperative pooling of their resources. As it is, each owner competes against another and pretty much does their own self interest thing. I think pooling budgets for example for a larger, full page Newspaper ad, which then points to a local website might generate some more interest. If I do the math right, in the WA area right now there are about 8 cohousing units for sale, one of them at Sharingwood. Each of these is different, yet I imagine each owner has the interest in selling their unit. In my experience, national advertising does not seem to work well in resales, local advertising gives better results. But that is just my experience, which is limited. Anybody have better luck with actual resales coming from people from out of state who were attracted by national advertising? Rob Sandelin Sharingwood, where there is a custom home for sale check out www.ic.org/nica/myhouse.htm -----Original Message----- From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org [mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf Of Fred H Olson Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 6:58 PM To: Cohousing-L Subject: Re: [C-L]_Advertising advice Advice on what works and what does not is interesting but I would urge caution about writing off mainstream media publicity totally. I can imagine that general articles about cohousing raise general awareness that in turn may someday be helpful even if it does not yield immediate prospects. Aren't there number for how many times a message has to be heard to be acted on? I guess what I'm suggesting is that even tho paid advertising in mainstream media may not be worth it, free stories there may be worth it to the cohousing movement in general. The fact that there seems to be more cohousing in certain areas - Colorado Seattle, San Francisco Bay area, and Mass. - would suggest that there is a threshold of awareness phenomenon that makes any single effort eaier to recruit for. If enough people are aware of cohousing, things are easier. Fred -- TEMP ADDRESS 4/9/02 My "From:" address has temporarily changed; My preferred address IS NOW and continues to be as below. Fred H. Olson fholson [at] cohousing.org Minneapolis,MN 55411 (612)588-9532 Amateur radio: WB0YQM List manager of: Cohousing-L and Nbhd-tc (Twin Cities Neighborhood issues list) _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Advertising advice pattymara, May 30 2002
-
Re: Advertising advice Elizabeth Stevenson, May 30 2002
-
Re: Advertising advice Sharon Villines, May 30 2002
- Re: Advertising advice Fred H Olson, May 30 2002
- RE: Advertising advice Rob Sandelin, June 2 2002
- Re: Advertising advice/Collaborating w/ other Cohos Ann Zabaldo, June 3 2002
- Re: Advertising advice Chris ScottHanson, June 3 2002
-
Re: Advertising advice Sharon Villines, May 30 2002
- RE: Advertising advice Catya Belfer-Shevett, May 31 2002
-
Re: Advertising advice Elizabeth Stevenson, May 30 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.