Sorting criteria for cohousing. | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ormond Otvos (ormond![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 09:10:01 -0600 (MDT) |
The poor we will always have with us, because it takes five hundred of them to make a rich person feel content, and there are plenty of people driven enough to be rich. Wanting to make places for the poor is a fine idea, but cohousing is not affordable housing PRIMARILY, but housing for people aware enough of the conditions in society and their life to want to work with others to live a particular way. I've much experience with living with the poor, and although there are many wonderful poor people, it isn't my primary sort criterium for social situations. In cohousing, I would be sorting for social drives, cooperation, understanding of interactions. Are you maintaining that cohousing, already a difficult proposition, should burden itself with affordability also? I think it overextending, myself. Ormond -- Rule 110 states that a cell becomes white IF its previous color and its two neighbors are all black or all white OR if its previous color was white and the two neighbors are black and white respectively otherwise the cell becomes black. If now BWW, what will be the next color? >From "A New Kind Of Science" by Stephen Wolfram _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Sorting criteria for cohousing. Ormond Otvos, June 29 2002
-
Affordability as Intention Maggie, June 29 2002
- Re: Affordability as Intention Elizabeth Stevenson, June 29 2002
-
Affordability/diversity/housing for the poor/rich, etc. Elizabeth Stevenson, June 29 2002
- Re: Affordability/diversity/housing for the poor/rich, etc. Racheli Gai, June 30 2002
-
Affordability as Intention Maggie, June 29 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.