RE: RetroFit Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:11:01 -0600 (MDT) |
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Chris "Kif" Scheuer wrote: > I visited CommunityNow! in Rochester NY not too long ago, who sort of tried > this and it would be interesting to talk with them. It appeared at the time > of our visit that they were struggling to maintain membership and activity. Kif, thank you for the update on CommunityNow! even if it is rather discouraging. I would like to hear from someone in CommunityNow! directly also. But indeed it is much harder to write bad news. I have been an advocate of Retrofit Cohousing for some time. I use that term (which I attribute to Kevin Wolf at N Street) to mean: Retrofit Cohousing is developed in existing housing by changing the way the occupants of that housing relate - usually with new occupants moving in to participate in the community. Retrofiting the social relations and not necessarily the structures. ( See my little Retrofit Cohousing web page at: ) ( http://freenet.msp.mn.us/~fholson/cohousing/retrofit/ ) But it has been somewhat discouraging. There have been two promising Retrofit Cohousing communities that have apparently / effectively disbanded. In those, personal disagreements were major factors. The community we were trying to build here in North Minneapolis (sometimes called "Homewood Cohousing") has pretty much stalled. Factors in our case are rising housing prices, few houses available, resulting small numbers of people, busy schedules. Our efforts have resulted in some good things in our pleasant neighborhood so I dont consider it a failed effort - just not cohousing (yet). Kevin's point that Retrofit Cohousing is a long term (20 years) project leads to the question of whether setbacks in the three communites I mentioned are setbacks which will be overcome or not. Who decides when a community is defunct (for inclusing in the database for example) when things look grim? In the case of the communities with personal disagreements does one take the opinion of those who have left of those who remain? What if only one household remains? Sticky problem. Despite these problems I continue to think that the retrofit approach has merits. Fred > > Chris Scheuer > ----------------------------------o-------------------------------- > Master of Science Program * Research Assistant > Doctoral Program in Architecture o Center for Sustainable Systems > University of Michigan * 430 E. University > cscheuer [at] umich.edu o Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1115 > * www.css.snre.umich.edu > o ph: 734-936-2542 > * fax: 734-647-5841 > ----------------------------------o-------------------------------- > -- Fred H. Olson Minneapolis,MN 55411 (near north Mpls) fholson [at] cohousing.org 612-588-9532 (7am-10pm Cent time) List manager of Cohousing-L & Nbhd-tc Ham radio:WB0YQM More info: http://www.mtn.org/~fholson/sig-detail.htm _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- RE: Retrofit Cohousing, (continued)
- RE: Retrofit Cohousing Stuart Staniford-Chen, June 7 1995
- Retrofit cohousing Kevin Wolf, December 15 1997
- Re: Retrofit cohousing Sanda Everette, December 17 1997
-
RE: RetroFit Cohousing Chris "Kif" Scheuer, July 7 2002
- RE: RetroFit Cohousing Fred H Olson, July 8 2002
- RE: RE: Retrofit Cohousing Mike Baldwin, July 8 2002
- Re: RE: Retrofit Cohousing Jeff Zucker, July 8 2002
- Re: RE: RetroFit Cohousing Sanda Everette, July 9 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.