Re: Affordable co-housing? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kay Argyle (argylemines.utah.edu) | |
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:24:01 -0600 (MDT) |
Our low-income one-bedroom unit is available, so we checked the application requirements for the state low-income housing program that helped us build it and the others. To qualify, a single person's annual income must be under $20K. Furthermore, they can't be a student, even part-time. On the subject of small unit design -- my room-mate & I were impressed with the layout of the one-bedroom and studio units at Trillium Hollow (Portland). Trillium Hollow's main residential building is a long rectangle with an opening midway on the side and a courtyard in the middle. Most units face the courtyard. The small units are (all/mostly?) on the first floor, excellent for an older couple or single person. There's an elevator up to the second level and down to the parking garage, ground level on the downhill side. In the one-bedroom we saw, you enter a small lobby area with the bathroom (I think) on the left and the kitchen on the right. You walk past a dividing wall into the living room. Ahead is a door opening to a small patio on the outside of the building, and on your left a glass wall with French doors into the bedroom (a customization, I think, but well worthwhile). Big windows in the kitchen look into the courtyard, and in the living room and bedroom, out to the hillside. The studio faces out (more private and quiet). The space is a U, the front door on the side, a big room at the base, arms forming the kitchen and the sleeping cubby, and the bathroom in the middle, opening into the sleeping cubby. The ceilings are high, and the front wall mostly windows. The big room is next to the walk-through into the courtyard, and half of that wall has windows also, then solid wall opposite the sleeping cubby. The sleeping cubby has a storage loft, big enough to put a mattress up there and use the space below another way. The main room felt very comfortable psychologically -- I'm not sure, but it may form a golden rectangle (1:1.618). The light is fantastic, except in the sleeping cubby, which is pleasantly dark. The liberal windows made both units feel much more spacious than they actually were, and they both had as much kitchen cabinetry as even our four-bedrooms. Kay Wasatch Commons, SLC where the one-bedrooms waste space on hallways, and are upstairs(!). argyle [at] mines.utah.edu *:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:* _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Affordable co-housing? Small Units, (continued)
- Re: Affordable co-housing? Small Units Sharon Villines, October 9 2002
- Re: Affordable co-housing? Small Units Elizabeth Stevenson, October 9 2002
- Re: Affordable co-housing? Small Units Maggi Rohde, October 9 2002
- Re: Affordable co-housing? Small Units Sharon Villines, October 9 2002
- Re: Affordable co-housing? Kay Argyle, October 9 2002
- Re: Affordable co-housing? Maggi Rohde, October 9 2002
- Message not available
- Re: Affordable co-housing? Robert Arjet, October 12 2002
- Re: Affordable co-housing? Sharon Villines, October 13 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.