Re: [C-L] Consensus (Again) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 12:53:01 -0700 (MST) |
On 12/24/2002 1:44 PM, "Rob Sandelin" <floriferous [at] msn.com> wrote: > Consensus, as you all know, does not mean I agree. It means I give my > consent, which means I give permission. Experienced consensus folks > understand that it can be in the best interest of the group to give > permission to something you disagree with. I'm more and more leaning toward the sociocratic definition of consensus as "no objections" rather than "consent." It gets one out of the bind of even having to decide if you agree or disagree that such and such an action is in the "best interests of the group." Deciding what is or is not in the best interests of the group is an abstraction that in and of itself can cause terminal paralysis. We recently tried just asking "is there any alternative on this list of options that anyone can't live with" and it shortened our discussion by several hours, if not weeks. We were trying to make a decision on what kind of fence we wanted around a plot of land and what we wanted to do on the land. (1) We made a list of options. (2) We eliminated the options that some "could not live with" and no one else strongly wanted (3) Asked people who wanted various options to "adopt" them and come to a planning meeting to work out implementation. (4) Eliminated the options no one wanted to work to implement This left a short list of options that the team will work on and come back with a proposal that includes costs and implementation of all the options that are doable and compatible on the land with such and such a fence. Just eliminating unworkable and unsupported options up front was so helpful in both (1) seeing what the final proposal might look like and (2) knowing who was willing to work on what tasks. > Humility is foundation for > consensus to be able to function. I don't think humility is the word you wanted. From the OED: "The quality of being humble or having a lowly opinion of oneself; meekness, lowliness, humbleness: the opposite of pride or haughtiness." If having a low opinion of oneself is the quality needed to reach consensus, then pride and haughtiness would be the cause of not reaching consensus. Can one prove that one is not proud or haughty by never objecting to anything? Merry Christmas to Everyone! Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Meeting Tools, (continued)
- Re: Meeting Tools Jeanne Goodman, December 23 2002
-
RE: Meeting Tools Catya Belfer-Shevett, December 24 2002
- RE: Meeting Tools -> Consensus Cards Greg Dunn, December 24 2002
-
RE: Meeting Tools Rob Sandelin, December 24 2002
- Re: [C-L] Consensus (Again) Sharon Villines, December 24 2002
- RE: Meeting Tools Catya Belfer-Shevett, December 24 2002
-
Re: Meeting Tools Kay Argyle, December 24 2002
- Re: Meeting Tools Tree Bressen, December 26 2002
- Re: Meeting Tools Sharon Villines, December 27 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.