RE: Gossip vs. venting | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Casey Morrigan (cjmorr![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 17:05:02 -0700 (MST) |
I was so interested in people's responses to this post. During the time I have lived here, my main community task has been to try to figure out how to approach people when I am in conflict with them. I've had a couple of insights in the three and half years I've lived here. First, I have noticed when I have felt wronged around some community issue that I want the community to "be on my side" and I have occasionally wanted to create a forum so I can get validated and be right. Embarrassing but true. Such a forum might be a business meeting. I've learned that this doesn't work well in a business meeting. It ends up being a hidden agenda and puts a sharp edge to my contributions. So where then? The more I take responsibility for speaking with the person who I am in conflict with, the better it goes. The community cannot process my stuff - I have to. The community CAN provide me with allies who will be sounding boards, maybe someone to go with me to have a talk with the person. Also, the community can do what Rob suggested - provide well-facilitated places where issues about living together can be surfaced and discussed. There is hardly any substitute for a personal conversation when the issue is personal. We bring in all our communication skills and habits and agree in community to try these out on one another. I have found some gaps in my skills and have needed to work on them. Of course, I notice everyone else's gaps first. I have to keep swinging that pointing finger back to me. Not all solutions to issues that arise in cohousing can be found in one-on-one communication, but the more someone really processes their stuff themselves, the less they "act out" in community. I want to be "in community" but I have occasionally wondered, does that mean I have to provide "group therapy" to people who are having lots of trouble? I'm not equipped and how I hate drama! Sometimes when I am not involved in an issue it is instructive to sit back and watch how it gets resolved; I pick up a few "how-to's" and "how-not's" then. Casey Morrigan Two Acre Wood Sebastopol California Anyhow, we are noticing tensions in our community dynamics, especially among those who live in the house. One issue that has come up is determining when and how it is helpful for people to discuss negative feelings. People do not always immediately want to talk to a person they are upset with. Sometimes they want a sounding board or a second opinion on the validity of their complaint. Sometimes they just want to vent. Sometimes they just don't want to confront even though they should. We have seen cases in which the person being complained to has felt the problem required action and proceeded to tell others. At one point this resulted in an emergency meeting that left some of our members feeling ambushed because this was the first they heard that they were the problem. They were too shocked to give their side of the story so this meeting did not open up communication. I am having trouble sorting out in my own mind who should say what to whom and when. Any ideas on guidlines? Jayne _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Gossip vs. venting, (continued)
- Re: Gossip vs. venting Tree Bressen, December 30 2002
- Re: Gossip vs. venting Sharon Villines, December 31 2002
- Re: Gossip vs. venting S. Kashdan, January 1 2003
- Re: Gossip vs. venting - conflict resolution resources Tree Bressen, January 16 2003
- RE: Gossip vs. venting Casey Morrigan, December 28 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.