the group and the individual | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Casey Morrigan (cjmorr![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 17:56:05 -0700 (MST) |
I've found that how a group functions - group dynamics - is really different from how individuals function. Feelings emerge differently when in a group; implicit and explicit rules are different. But the paradox is that individuals need to really come out with what is on their individual minds in order for a group to do well. This reminds me that several (great) times in our community's history, the group has had a better "brain" than individuals - the interaction and back and forth resulted in a solution that no individual had been able to devise. I am reading a book I just ordered up from the FIC (Fellowship of Intentional Community) called, "Sitting in the Fire - Large group transformation using conflict and diversity" - by Arnold Mindell. It's really opening up my eyes. Anyone else read this? I'm only part way through it and I am liking especially how he talks about rank and how it is used. Casey Morrigan Two Acre Wood Sebastopol, California > -----Original Message----- > From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org > [mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf Of Sharon Villines > Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 7:33 AM > To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org > Subject: Re: [C-L]_Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? > > > > > > "Ruddick, T.R." <Ruddick [at] edisonohio.edu> > > is the author of the message below. > > > > > If nothing else, this discussion reinforces my belief that > the tired > > old > > false dichotomy of liberal-conservative needs to be put to rest. > > > And while we are at it, we need to retire the false dichotomy of > individual-group. "For the good of the group not the individual" is > ultimately a meaningless distinction. The group only exists > because of > individuals. Only individuals can act. Once you decide that a > group is > something different than the individuals in it, you are on very thin > ice. > > While combined efforts of a group of individuals can produce results > that are greater than the sum of its parts, it can also > produce results > that are far less. The only productive group is one that can utilize > the full strengths of all the individuals within it. > > Sharon > ----- > Sharon Villines, Washington DC > Where all roads lead to Casablanca > > _______________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list > Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L > _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Chris Scheuer, February 6 2003
- Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? JazzUptown, February 6 2003
-
Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Fred H Olson, February 8 2003
-
Re: Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Sharon Villines, February 8 2003
- the group and the individual Casey Morrigan, February 8 2003
- Re: the group and the individual Tree Bressen, February 8 2003
- Re: the group and the individual Sharon Villines, February 9 2003
-
Re: Re: Is living cooperatively an ideology of itself? Sharon Villines, February 8 2003
- Ohio cohousing Carol Braford, February 9 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.