Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddess![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:20:01 -0700 (MST) |
So? I don't think anything needs to be put in a box and labeled cohousing. It is whatever people want it to be. I know there are people out there who oppose calling special interest communities cohousing, but until a better term comes along, I can't imagine it would harm anybody or the movement in any way. Why does it matter to you? -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento, California tamgoddess [at] attbi.com >> >> Multi-generational Cohousing is fantastic, yet, some of us need to spend >> our sunset years primarily with others with similar needs, goals, energies >> etc. > > This, IMO, goes against the whole concept and philosophy of > cohousing. It's not cohousing; it' s a retirement community. > > Sara _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Fifty Plus Cohousing Fred H Olson, February 13 2003
-
Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Sara A., February 13 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Elizabeth Stevenson, February 13 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Sara A., February 15 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Elizabeth Stevenson, February 16 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Sharon Villines, February 16 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing racheli, February 16 2003
-
Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Sara A., February 13 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.