Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddess![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 15:50:01 -0700 (MST) |
> Besides which, I question the motives for wanting to restrict a community > to over-50 anyway. Seems to me like it's just a way of trying to get > around the laws against excluding families with children by setting up a > different requirement that merely makes their presence highly unlikely. > > Sara I don't see this suspicious motive in what she wrote. It seems to me that there is a subtext here you're not talking about. Maybe it wouldn't be cohousing, but where would one go to see if others would be interested in something that's very much like cohousing, besides here? It seems an innocent enough request. -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento, California tamgoddess [at] attbi.com _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Fifty Plus Cohousing Fred H Olson, February 13 2003
-
Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Sara A., February 13 2003
-
Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Elizabeth Stevenson, February 13 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Sara A., February 15 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Elizabeth Stevenson, February 16 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Sharon Villines, February 16 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing racheli, February 16 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Christine Johnson, February 17 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Sara A., February 17 2003
-
Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Elizabeth Stevenson, February 13 2003
-
Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing Sara A., February 13 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.