Re: Children | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: racheli (racheli![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 07:15:02 -0700 (MST) |
Kay, You seem to put a certain spin on my words which wasn't there. Also, I'm seeing your description of children as being highly overgeneralized, as if they are all the same. They are not. To talk about specific children, in this case my own: I've used very different criteria than yours in bringing them up, and IMO even by your criteria as to what consists a "well behaved child", they are well ahead of the pack (not just IMO, but I'm constantly told so by other coho and other people). It's of course difficult to provide a "counter example" for your hypothesis over email, but everyone who cares to check out might find that there are other (more effective, and more respectful) ways to interact with children than by the "laying down the law" measures. This is not to say that there are no rules which kids need to follow. IMO kids who are not harassed by too many rules they had no part in setting are very agreeable to following reasonable rules. In the case of my kids, in many cases they used to be worried about whether *I* woould follow given rules well enough (the anarchist that I am :)) I think it was Sharon (from DC) who suggested in one of her posts that rules should attempt (whenever applicable/possible) to be regarding behavior, not age. I am very much in agreement. R. >> I don't think it's healthy for kids to encounter such hostility ... >Whoa! It is not "hostility" to feel that, occasionally, it would be nice >for the children's wants and needs not to be the _foremost_ >consideration, especially when they aren't even your kids. >Part of growing up is learning to be polite about being bored, to expect >to have to earn certain privileges, to realize other people have >interests you don't share and vice versa, to grasp that some rules are >enforced by reality instead of by parents, and to accept that you have to >behave in certain ways in certain places or you won't be welcome. >For that reason, it's actually good for kids to have some adults around >who don't indiscriminately love children -- who choose to associate with >them, or not, on the same standards they would an adult. >A child-centered environment doesn't teach those necessary life lessons. >Children need one or two adults to whom they are the center of the >universe -- and adults who put up with them as long as they're good, and >send them home when they aren't. Children need safety locks on the >chemical closets -- and cats who scratch when their tails are pulled. >Children need activities designed especially for them -- and activities >that are too challenging or where they get left home watching reruns with >a babysitter while the older folks have fun. >Children who don't have those experiences grow up to be adults who hold >loud cell phone conversations in libraries, step over the fence to get a >close-up photo of the alligator, and sulk if their partner asks, "Why do >we always have to go there?" >"You can't always get what you want" is something you accept with >equanimity if you learn it early, but treat with denial or outrage if >first encountered at a later age. >Kay ----------------------------------------------------------- racheli [at] sonoracohousing.com ----------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Children, (continued)
- Children sbraun, February 21 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Jeanne Goodman, February 20 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Sharon Villines, February 20 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Kay Argyle, February 20 2003
- Re: Children racheli, February 21 2003
- Re: Re: Children Kay Argyle, March 3 2003
- the Denmark connection Alex Hempton, March 2 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing-(OT?) Elizabeth Stevenson, February 16 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.