Re: Universal Design and Co-housing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Catya Belfer-Shevett (catya![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 06:30:02 -0600 (MDT) |
If universal design has not penetrated the co-housing movement, why not?
One would presume for the same reasons that seriously green building hasn't - because it's expensive, and because cohousing is still the most "mainstream" of the intentional community types.
- catya ____ Catya Belfer-Shevett ____\ / Interested in catya [at] pobox.com \ / \/ Cohousing in MA? www.catya.org \/ www.mosaic-commons.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing, (continued)
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Jim Snyder-Grant, June 15 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Joani Blank, June 16 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing David Hornick, June 16 2003
- RE: Universal Design and Co-housing Rodney Elin, June 16 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Catya Belfer-Shevett, June 16 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Jill Robinson, June 16 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Racheli Gai, June 16 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Sharon Villines, June 16 2003
- Re: Universal Design and Co-housing Elizabeth Stevenson, June 20 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.