Re: Getting things done | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddess![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:34:06 -0600 (MDT) |
We aren't the "fixits", but this seems to be an idea that works well. We have two people who fix things, as well as the committee that oversees buildings and grounds. If it's washers and dryers, it's David you want to talk to. David is pretty handy and can fix other things, too, but he's very busy and we go to Paul most often for other things. Paul is not just handy, he's here more and has reserves of energy that would be suspect in anyone else. These aren't the only people who fix things by any means (my personal specialty is installing ceiling fans), but they are the ones we know we can call and get immediate help. Receipts for what they buy go into a locked box. Then the accounting people make sure they get reimbursed. In the budget, this is repair and replacement. Things in repair and replacement get reimbursed automatically, with no decision-making process and no committee budgets involved. (Big-ticket items, even if they are r&r, get discussed in committee or gen'l meetings). If a project requires outside help, it gets referred to committee, which has authority, within their budget, to deal with it without general meetings. -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento, California tamgoddess [at] comcast.net > From: "Rob Sandelin" <floriferous [at] msn.com> > Reply-To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org > Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:14:36 -0700 > To: <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> > Subject: RE: [C-L]_Getting things done > > > As I posted before, there are decision making processes which work better > than others for different situations. Reading Cheryl's post about the > details and time involved to make a minor fix was a good example of a > process in which one person or team might have better success with less > effort involved. For example, there is a cohousing group (I forget which > one) has a team of three people called the fixits. They love fixing stuff, > and handle it. Just like the "super" would in a condo. They have their own > budget discretion up to $500 and as I murkily recall, they are very much up > on the maintenance and repair for their community. This group makes the > decisions and implements them with no other processes. They have built a > reputation in their community and people accept and rely on their judgment. > Any disagreements are handled in person with the team (which I think I > recall as being rare). > > If the group that has the fixits are on the list could you supply more > details? Too many places has fuzzed my memories. > > Rob Sandelin > South Snohomish County at the headwaters of Ricci Creek > Sky Valley Environments <http://www.nonprofitpages.com/nica/SVE.htm> > Field skills training for student naturalists > Floriferous [at] msn.com > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 > > _______________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list > Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Getting things done Sharon Villines, August 15 2003
-
Re: Getting things done Cheryl Charis-Graves, August 22 2003
- Re: Getting things done Sharon Villines, August 23 2003
-
RE: Getting things done Rob Sandelin, August 27 2003
- Re: Getting things done Elizabeth Stevenson, August 27 2003
-
Re: Getting things done Cheryl Charis-Graves, August 22 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.