Re: The problem with background checks | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddess![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:37:08 -0600 (MDT) |
Here, here. The whole background check thread is really offensive to me, but you put it in clear words. There is no substitute for human-to-human communication. A background check is what I might have to submit to when applying for a job. Cohousing should be just a *tad* more personal. -- Liz Stevenson Southside Park Cohousing Sacramento, California tamgoddess [at] comcast.net > > There is no way to guarantee anyone's safety in cohousing or in any other > community. But personally I think that much more can be gleaned by meeting and > getting to know a potential community member, than can be told by looking at > background checks which in reality tell you very little. Requiring a new > potential member to join as an associate member, come to meetings and get to > know the community is a much more effective way to provide for the safety of a > community than doing background checks. But neither one will give you 100% > security. > > > Emily Pitt > Jamaica Plain Cohousing _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
The problem with background checks Emily Pitt, August 27 2003
- Re: The problem with background checks Elizabeth Stevenson, August 27 2003
- Re: The problem with background checks Sharon Villines, August 27 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.