The problem with background checks | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Emily Pitt (epitt![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:52:11 -0600 (MDT) |
One major problem with the sex offender registry is that gay men have, in some states, been arrested for consensual activities that were outlawed by sodomy statutes and those individuals were required to register on registries along with pedophiles and rapists. Meanwhile, many civil issues don't ever end up on criminal records checks, such as whether a partner has ever taken out a restraining order against the individual (which obviously varies state to state). So you end up screening out individuals who could make wonderful contributions to communities (for example a gay man whose only "crime" is consensual activity with a loving partner), while screening in a batterer who is outwardly charming and friendly but who terrorizes a partner behind closed doors. Also, background checks might tell you about a recovering addict's past history of petty thefts and drug busts, but not about his five years of strong recovery, community service, and good parenting. There is no way to guarantee anyone's safety in cohousing or in any other community. But personally I think that much more can be gleaned by meeting and getting to know a potential community member, than can be told by looking at background checks which in reality tell you very little. Requiring a new potential member to join as an associate member, come to meetings and get to know the community is a much more effective way to provide for the safety of a community than doing background checks. But neither one will give you 100% security. Emily Pitt Jamaica Plain Cohousing -------Original Message------- From: Juva DuBoise <juva [at] comcast.net> Sent: 08/26/03 08:18 AM To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Subject: Re: [C-L]_Background check > > We, CoHo in Corvallis, Oregon are doing background checks and calling the sex offender list for every application. Doesn't mean that we would reject someone because what was found but would cover it during our "clearness committee" where we see if we are a match and concerns (both ways) are discussed. So far nothing has showed up that need to be figured out. Juva _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
The problem with background checks Emily Pitt, August 27 2003
-
Re: The problem with background checks Elizabeth Stevenson, August 27 2003
- Re: The problem with background checks Sharon Villines, August 27 2003
-
Re: The problem with background checks Elizabeth Stevenson, August 27 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.