Maintaining affordability | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Graham Meltzer (graham![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 16:39:08 -0700 (MST) |
Thanks Liz and David for the info. But this is really fascinating ... > Unfortunately, however, the affordability was only temporary. For 10 > (moderate) or 30 (low) years, sales were supposed to be only to someone in > the same financial category and at a restricted price. But the housing > authority that partnered with us on the deal has not been interested in > maintaining/enforcing even this much, so affordability is disappearing as > original subsidized owners move on (though more than half remain) and the I've often wondered when it's said that a unit HAS to be onsold to people in a similar low income catagory, and that the price HAS to be tied to median income levels ... whether, in fact, that's what happens. Who monitors and enforces it and with what level of committment? So David, do you think your experience is common? Do you know of other communities where the limitations on price rise have stuck and units have remained available to low income folk, only? Graham graham meltzer contemporary photography 15/27 ballow st, fortitude valley, qld 4006 ph: 07 3257 4852 web: www.grahammeltzer.com _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Maintaining affordability Graham Meltzer, December 25 2003
-
Re: Maintaining affordability David L. Mandel, December 27 2003
-
Re: Maintaining affordability Sharon Villines, December 27 2003
- Re: Maintaining affordability Guy Koehler, Rivendell Ranch, December 27 2003
- Re: Maintaining affordability M.Studer, December 27 2003
-
Re: Maintaining affordability Sharon Villines, December 27 2003
-
Re: Maintaining affordability David L. Mandel, December 27 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.