Income levels, jobs and stability | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: don i arkin (shardon5![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:03:09 -0700 (MST) |
Hi, I am very much in sympathy with Guy's goals but I believe that he and other responders are focusing on the wrong points because Rob was not clear enough in some of his points. I would agree that mortgage requirements screen out many people that Guy would agree were dysfunctional. I believe that Rob would agree that they also screen out many people that Rob would be happy to share a community with. I think Rob would also agree that plenty of dysfunctional people do qualify for mortgages, so that is not a perfect screen. There are communities that exist or are envisioned (such as Guy's) that are willing to forego the mortgage screen and do what is necessary to create a vibrant happy community without the dual-edged help of the mortgage screen, but they demand a lot more work than the others. This extra work probably shortens their histories. Other writers have touched on the scope of this work which includes battling the authorities governing building codes and insurance, psychological or process work for cooperation challenged residents, and the physical work and time requirements of actual construction, The vast majority of residents of this country are not willing to do this work. Many are not willing to put in the lesser amount of effort required for a successful "standard" cohousing community. I wish Guy and others with similar goals much success but unfortunately I do not believe that their successes will make much of a difference for the overall housing situation in our country, while I believe that "standard" cohousing can improve the living situation for many. I definitely am unhappy with the high costs of cohousing in general. As a member of Sonora cohousing, I waged a several year, largely losing battle to keep our construction costs lower. The reasons for my defeats are complex but mainly have to do with the prevailing American consumer mindset (bigger and more expensive is better?) along with the developer's and contractor's inherent biases towards more expensive projects. One last caveat for those looking to prevent home prices from appreciating. For home owner/residents, appreciation is not "profit". Instead it is the freedom to someday move to another piece of real estate that has presumably also been appreciating. Don _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Re: Income levels, jobs and stability WOLF1GDSFM, December 27 2003
- Re: Income levels, jobs and stability Guy Koehler, Rivendell Ranch, December 27 2003
- Income levels, jobs and stability don i arkin, December 29 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.