parking and common house placement | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lynn Nadeau (welcome![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:02:16 -0700 (MST) |
>I'd like to ask others on the listserve their opinion about whether it's >really necessary to have people pass the common house on the way from >the parking lot to their homes....I seem to need to transport a lot of stuff wherever I go. .... >I liked your design that puts the common house in the middle, >where everyone can see it and get to it easily. >Louisa Thompson I'm at RoseWind Cohousing in Port Townsend WA. We are an up and running community of 24 households. Our site plan is a Planned Unit Development within the City limits, and we were constrained in a number of ways by rules about fire engine access, ambulance access, etc etc. The net result is that we can all drive to our homes, vs our original plan to just have parking lot(s)/garden carts. And this has NOT destroyed community here. It has either been neutral or a benefit to many of us. Being able to drive (usually one car, with somewhat more removed parking for additional car or guests) to our house has made it much easier for those who are less mobile, but also for those with sleeping children, groceries, goods being moved to or from, etc. As far as community is concerned, we all park outdoors (nobody built a garage) and can flag each other down in our yards, including when people are coming or going to their car. I can see at a glance who is home, who has guests, and such, so in that respect it also connects us, like seeing if someone's lights are on or off at night. We had originally considered placing our common house in the middle (the houses are roughly around the edge of a central commons). However, this was in conflict with our desire to have a car-free center (all those driveways and access roads are on the perimeter). Having the common house in the middle would have meant that anyone needing to drive to it (mobility impaired, lots of supplies for cooking a meal, etc) would be bringing a car in, plus it would mean trucks in and out of the center for garbage, recycling, yard waste collection, UPS/FedEx/Postal (our mailboxes are there>, as well as meter readers, propane delivery, repair and service vehicles. Plus we would have needed to provide the necessary access for fire trucks (which would have had to come far enough from the road to then require a whole engineered turnaround). We moved the CH to the perimeter, along a street, with a good-sized parking lot that is well used. And our central field is car free: the children run and play there, the dogs chase balls, our gardens grow. Most of us can see the CH from our homes. Almost none of us need to pass it to reach our homes. Our CH is used quite often: this week has seen potlucks Wed, Thurs, Saturday, TGIF snacks Friday, discussion circle Monday, team-cooked meal Monday, several meetings of committees or personal uses, like a singing group rehearsal. Lynn Nadeau, RoseWind Cohousing Port Townsend Washington (Victorian seaport, music, art, nature) http://www.rosewind.org http://www.ptguide.com http://www.ptforpeace.info (very active peace movement here- see our photo) _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
parking and common house placement Lynn Nadeau, February 7 2004
-
RE: parking and common house placement Rob Sandelin, February 8 2004
- Re: parking and common house placement Laura Fitch, February 10 2004
- Re: parking and common house placement Mac Thomson, February 8 2004
-
RE: parking and common house placement Rob Sandelin, February 8 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.