Subject: [C-L]_ Boundaries | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Pacific Gardens Cohousing Community (cohousing![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:47:10 -0800 (PST) |
Hello everyone,I would like to follow-up on the concerns of Roberts Creek Cohousing, where there is a public path close to the property and youth hanging out around the Cohousing Community. I don't have the answers, just more questions for discussion on this topic!
Our City would like us to build a public walking trail through our property and dedicate the land we own beside the river as public parkland. This is part of what they consider a "Community Contribution". We have balked at this request (which is more like a demand) for the same reasons that Roberts Creek is now having problems. Response from the City is along the lines of ' you say you are community-minded; what's your problem?'
- How many other Cohousing Communities have public pathways on their property or immediately adjacent?
- Have Cities required dedication of land for public use?- How safe is the Cohousing Community from vandalism, theft, children being at risk, without creating a fenced, gated community? None of us want to barricade ourselves in and others out! - How do we identify un-authorized people on our property, given that the public has easy access?
I look forward to the responses to this and Stacia Leech's posting. Cheers, Susana Michaelis Pacific Gardens Cohousing Community www.pacificgardens.ca
-
Subject: [C-L]_ Boundaries Pacific Gardens Cohousing Community, February 16 2005
-
RE: Subject: [C-L]_ Boundaries Alexander Robin A, February 16 2005
-
Re: Subject: [C-L]_ Boundaries normangauss, February 16 2005
- Re: Subject: [C-L]_ Boundaries John Beutler, February 16 2005
-
Re: Subject: [C-L]_ Boundaries normangauss, February 16 2005
-
RE: Subject: [C-L]_ Boundaries Alexander Robin A, February 16 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.