Re: Getting Buy-In on Decisions | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:35:33 -0700 (PDT) |
On Sep 10, 2005, at 6:06 AM, OCC611ng wrote:
As time goes on, we are experiencing less and less interest in Membershipmeetings.
In contemporary society with all our means of communication, we need to rethink the purpose of meetings. It is reasonable to expect people to sit for two hours in a room in order to ratify a decision that is either of no interest to them or that will be decided as they think it should be whether they are there or not.
Meetings were established when we had no other means of communication amongst groups of people. Having everyone in the room together was the only way to dependably and accurately share information. This is no longer true. There are many ways to share information and with our diverse household schedules and available options for how we want to spend out or time, meetings are one of the most difficult and least satisfying.
Announcements in meetings for example boggle the mind. They are much better made in email or on bulletin boards where everyone is likely to see them. By the time the meeting minutes get circulated, the announcement is usually void. But X number of people still have to sit through announcements.
Many decisions are obviously going to be made in a certain direction. But once they get on the agenda, everyone feels beholden to be a good meeting member and contribute to the conversation. Nice speeches and arguments but most often repetitive and unenlightening.
The one advantage of a meeting is being able to discuss an issue on which there is a diversity of interest and concern. If people are not interested in the meetings it is probably because they have no interest in the decisions being made there.
In sociocracy, it is assumed that if you are not in the meeting, you agree with whatever is decided.
Having the board ratify that the meeting was properly called and announced is standard practice, I think. The Board is responsible for ensuring the proper functioning of the corporation.
Sharon --- Sharon VillinesBuilding Community: A Newsletter on Coops, Condos, Cohousing, and Other New Neighborhoods
http://www.buildingcommunitynews.org
- Re: Re: Sharon's Comments About How to Start Reforming Our Condos, (continued)
-
Re: Re: Sharon's Comments About How to Start Reforming Our Condos James Kacki, September 9 2005
-
Getting Buy-In on Decisions OCC611ng, September 10 2005
- Re: Getting Buy-In on Decisions Jean Reese, September 10 2005
- Re: Getting Buy-In on Decisions OCC611ng, September 10 2005
- Re: Getting Buy-In on Decisions Sharon Villines, September 10 2005
- Re: Getting Buy-In on Decisions OCC611ng, September 10 2005
- Re: Getting Buy-In on Decisions Sharon Villines, September 10 2005
- Re: Getting Buy-In on Decisions OCC611ng, September 10 2005
- Re: Getting Buy-In on Decisions Sharon Villines, September 10 2005
-
Getting Buy-In on Decisions OCC611ng, September 10 2005
-
Re: Re: Sharon's Comments About How to Start Reforming Our Condos James Kacki, September 9 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.