Re: consequences in community/work participation | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:45:00 -0800 (PST) |
On Nov 30, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Racheli Gai wrote:
formal/rigid standards.
But why are monetary contributions never referred to as "forma/rigid"? These are words filled with emotional connotations not applied to set community condo fees, for example.
Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Coauthor with John Buck of the forthcoming Sociocracy: A New Power Structure for Ethical Governance http://www.buildingcommunitynews.org/sociocracy/publications
-
consequences in community ilyse simon, November 30 2005
-
Re: consequences in community Robert, November 30 2005
-
RE: consequences in community Rob Sandelin, November 30 2005
- Re: consequences in community/work participation Racheli Gai, November 30 2005
- Re: consequences in community/work participation Sharon Villines, November 30 2005
- Re: consequences in community/work participation Racheli Gai, November 30 2005
-
RE: consequences in community Rob Sandelin, November 30 2005
- You can have it both ways Rob Sandelin, November 30 2005
- Re: You can have it both ways Sharon Villines, November 30 2005
-
Re: consequences in community Robert, November 30 2005
- Re: consequences in community Chris ScottHanson, December 1 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.