Landscape Design/Pedestrian Paths | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Robert Finn (finn![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 09:10:45 -0800 (PST) |
Here at Pleasant Hill Cohousing, we were originally excited to have
decomposed granite pathways. We began to regret it immediately after
move-in. The entire pathway turned into a muddy mess in even the slightest
rain. We continually tracked the DG into our homes. When it was dry there
was lots and lots of dust. After considering a number of possible causes
(including that the DG may have been installed incorrectly, that it had not
been given a long enough time to set before use, etc.) we came to the
conclusion that this was just not a good material for a main pathway that
gets a lot of use. After a long consensus process we finally agreed to
replace the DG with paving stones at a cost of $32,000
And we had all these problems with DG even though we're located in an area that's very hot all summer long and gets no rain whatsoever for 6 months of the year. I may be mistaken, but I believe Ashland, Oregon may be slightly damper than that.
As a negative evangelist for DG, I'd be happy to share our experiences in more detail with any cohousing communities. Feel free to call me at 925-685-6993.
Happy ChristmaHannuSolstiRamadaKwanzaakah to everyone! Bob Finn At 09:16 PM 12/23/2005, cohousing-l-request [at] cohousing.org wrote:
Our cohousing group here in Ashland is getting very busy finalizing the landscape plans. In designing our pedestrian paths, we would like to create organically styled (flowing around natural contours and human movement, ie. not linear) pathways that would create areas for gardening, privacy and play in our common outdoor space. Our landscape architect is suggesting 1/4 minus Decomposed Granite (DG) for the pathways. There is some concerns about this material and how well it will work. Does it tend to track into homes and other places? Does it need a lot of repairs to prevent muddy spots? Does anyone have any experiences with this or suggestions for other materials to consider?
- Re: Landscape Design/Pedestrian Paths, (continued)
- Re: Landscape Design/Pedestrian Paths Jock Coats, December 27 2005
- Re: Landscape Design/Pedestrian Paths Jock Coats, December 27 2005
-
RE: Landscape Design/Pedestrian Paths Prescott Nichols, January 3 2006
- RE: Pervious Concrete Paving Prescott Nichols, January 6 2006
- Landscape Design/Pedestrian Paths Robert Finn, December 24 2005
-
RE: Landscape Design/Pedestrian Paths Patricia Chadwick, December 27 2005
- RE: Landscape Design/Pedestrian Paths Fleck, December 27 2005
-
Re: Landscape Design/Pedestrian Paths Deborah Mensch, December 27 2005
- RE: Landscape Design/Pedestrian Paths Fleck, December 27 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.