Re: Values in community, was sexuality | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:20:18 -0800 (PST) |
On Mar 16, 2006, at 10:27 AM, ken wrote:
I'm not sure how that might help people living in cohousing but it wassuch a relief for me to find that question, that I thought I would shareit.I'm not understanding who would be asking such a question and for what purpose?
Note my closing comment about yours.One thought might be that the real issue is not sexuality that is the problem but other behaviors one associates with sexuality. Most of us could care less what kind of sex people are or are not having as long as it isn't forced upon us personally or wagged in our faces.
If you think deeper you may uncover a related issue that can be discussed much more easily and that is more to the point of your concerns -- whether the household is a prospective member or current member of your community.
Sharon --- Sharon Villines Building Community: A Guide to Creating New Neighborhoods http://www.buildingcommunity.info
- Re: Values in community, was sexuality, (continued)
-
Re: Values in community, was sexuality Cher Stuewe Portnoff, March 14 2006
-
Re: Values in community, was sexuality Craig Ragland, March 14 2006
- Re: Values in community, was sexuality Sharon Villines, March 15 2006
- Re: Values in community, was sexuality ken, March 16 2006
- Re: Values in community, was sexuality Sharon Villines, March 16 2006
- Re: Values in community, was sexuality Anna i Bartłomiej Jurkiewicz, March 16 2006
- Re: Values in community, was sexuality Bonnie Fergusson, March 16 2006
-
Re: Values in community, was sexuality Craig Ragland, March 14 2006
-
Re: Values in community, was sexuality Cher Stuewe Portnoff, March 14 2006
- Re: Values in community, was sexuality Sharon Villines, March 15 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.