BIG Co-housing. Who Loves It? Who Hates It? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lion Kuntz (lionkuntz![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:45:42 -0800 (PST) |
Brief Introduction. Name: Lion Kuntz, Location: Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, California, USA Had 30-year career-adventures in community activism, media, eco-projects, property management. Presently semi-disabled/retired. I want to know how people feel the chances are for a co-housing success story in a large mixed-use single-building multi-family structure. I don't expect a lot of people to be familiar with the prime example in my mind, but some Californians and San Franciscans are. I am thinking of Opera Plaza on Van Ness Blvd, SF, CA, commercial on ground floor (restaurant, boutiques, theaters) and residential above. The example I am focussed on is described by realtors as "luxury condos", but in fact the floor plans are probably similar to what many co-housing developments typically offer. Located as it is across from City Hall, where parking is scarce, the building includes subterranean garage parking for residents and customers of businesses located there. The ground floor is one city block, roughly one hectare or 2.5 acres, and the building height (if I remember correctly, I am 60 miles north of there) is 6 stories. I would guess it has probably one hundred units. What is the reaction to co-housing proposed on this scale? Both positive and negative reactions are welcome, but I anticipate more negatives, so to follow-up... What needs to change before it approaches your threshhold of acceptability? The nearest actual co-housing project is about 12 miles from me in Cotati, called FrogSong. It is a small town main street development with storefronts on the street level (which are not associated with the co-housing) and housing town-houses and apartments in a court behind and above the stores. With 30 residential units and 2.3 acres footprint it is one-third of the scale of Opera Plaza. From all reports FrogSong is a stellar success, so what is the "tipping point" before "too much of a good thing"? http://www.cotaticohousing.org/ http://www.builderonline.com/industry-news.asp?sectionID=26&articleID=159617 http://www.cohousingco.com/proj_Cotati.htm http://www.cotaticohousing.org/gallery.shtml This is not purely theoretical -- for three years I have been exposing the world to a concept for a larger project, on the scale of Opera Plaza on my website, to which 450,000 visitors have logged in. Although I favor urban developments, rural land is often very much lower cost, so a rural version of this concept may be considered first before it is seen in cities. I have never used the term "co-housing" as a descriptor, although a majority of the elements in my concept are probably found in the average "co-housing community". Depending on what the home-owners association wanted, it could be co-housing from the roots up. The key points: *** BIG (hectare, city block) *** MIxed-Use, commercial space on ground floor *** 100 families. Would you consider it? If not, what needs to change before you would? What is the one most important objection or barrier from you considering something like this? Sincerely, Lion Kuntz Sonoma County, California, USA __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
-
Eco-Communities Talk in RI Bekah, March 20 2006
- BIG Co-housing. Who Loves It? Who Hates It? Lion Kuntz, March 23 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.