Re: BIG Co-housing. Who Loves It? Who Hates It? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Patjavcc (Patjavcc![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:27:24 -0800 (PST) |
I would consider this in an urban environment - San Fran is perfect (I lived there for 8 years from 1990 - 1998). For this to really work, it should be broken up into min-neighborhoods. Each 'hood would have it's own shared commonspace. With 100 units, I can imagine between three and four 'hoods in the building. These can be mixed up randomely or separated by interests. For example: elders in one area, families with children or child-friendly adults in another. Or maybe they can be separated by interests - for example: an artist neighborhood. Each group would meet individually to plan the common space, rules, etc. I love this idea. It could be very eco-friendly with so many shared resources. Plus in San Francisco...perfect. So, Good Luck! Patti Lautner JP Cohousing Boston, MA In a message dated 3/26/2006 12:06:54 AM Eastern Standard Time, lionkuntz [at] yahoo.com writes: > Brief Introduction. > > Name: Lion Kuntz, > Location: Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, California, USA > Had 30-year career-adventures in community activism, media, > eco-projects, property management. Presently > semi-disabled/retired. > > I want to know how people feel the chances are for a co-housing > success story in a large mixed-use single-building multi-family > structure. > > I don't expect a lot of people to be familiar with the prime > example in my mind, but some Californians and San Franciscans > are. I am thinking of Opera Plaza on Van Ness Blvd, SF, CA, > commercial on ground floor (restaurant, boutiques, theaters) and > residential above. The example I am focussed on is described by > realtors as "luxury condos", but in fact the floor plans are > probably similar to what many co-housing developments typically > offer. Located as it is across from City Hall, where parking is > scarce, the building includes subterranean garage parking for > residents and customers of businesses located there. The ground > floor is one city block, roughly one hectare or 2.5 acres, and > the building height (if I remember correctly, I am 60 miles > north of there) is 6 stories. I would guess it has probably one > hundred units. > > What is the reaction to co-housing proposed on this scale? Both > positive and negative reactions are welcome, but I anticipate > more negatives, so to follow-up... What needs to change before > it approaches your threshhold of acceptability? > > The nearest actual co-housing project is about 12 miles from me > in Cotati, called FrogSong. It is a small town main street > development with storefronts on the street level (which are not > associated with the co-housing) and housing town-houses and > apartments in a court behind and above the stores. With 30 > residential units and 2.3 acres footprint it is one-third of the > scale of Opera Plaza. From all reports FrogSong is a stellar > success, so what is the "tipping point" before "too much of a > good thing"? > > http://www.cotaticohousing.org/ > http://www.builderonline.com/industry-news.asp?sectionID=26&articleID=159617 > http://www.cohousingco.com/proj_Cotati.htm > http://www.cotaticohousing.org/gallery.shtml > > This is not purely theoretical -- for three years I have been > exposing the world to a concept for a larger project, on the > scale of Opera Plaza on my website, to which 450,000 visitors > have logged in. Although I favor urban developments, rural land > is often very much lower cost, so a rural version of this > concept may be considered first before it is seen in cities. I > have never used the term "co-housing" as a descriptor, although > a majority of the elements in my concept are probably found in > the average "co-housing community". Depending on what the > home-owners association wanted, it could be co-housing from the > roots up. > > The key points: > *** BIG (hectare, city block) > *** MIxed-Use, commercial space on ground floor > *** 100 families. > > Would you consider it? If not, what needs to change before you > would? What is the one most important objection or barrier from > you considering something like this? > > Sincerely, Lion Kuntz > Sonoma County, California, USA > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >
- Re: Re: BIG Co-housing. Who Loves It? Who Hates It?, (continued)
- Re: Re: BIG Co-housing. Who Loves It? Who Hates It? dwoodard, March 27 2006
- Re: Re: BIG Co-housing. Who Loves It? Who Hates It? Jock Coats, March 27 2006
-
Re: BIG Co-housing. Who Loves It? Who Hates It? ken, March 29 2006
- new cohousing in coastal northern California sga1, March 29 2006
- Re: BIG Co-housing. Who Loves It? Who Hates It? Lion Kuntz, April 1 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.