Re: Subsidizing a health care provider on site - dose itattract the already frail? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: dahlen (dahlen![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:11:29 -0700 (PDT) |
I wondering if an insurance company which carries long term care policies
could in some way become a part of a cohousing community. Maybe for a
minimal assessment to all members to go towards a policy for a limited
number of persons at any one time on a homecare basis using those in the
community. There are currently policies which permit one to use family
members that may not be certified as an aid to do in-home care on a per diem
basis. It would no doubt be a very bureaucratic undertaking to get it
worked out with an insurance company/corporate structure but part of an
overall concept of care that just might work well. What do you think?
Diane----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Sheehy" <martinsheehy [at] yahoo.com> To: <advocate [at] philanthropynow.com>; "Cohousing-L" <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 11:59 AMSubject: Re: [C-L]_ Subsidizing a health care provider on site - dose itattract the already frail?
Funnily enough, as a retiring ( no!, not shy) physician I had advanced this concept to CoHo USA. I had even gone further: " American Medicine: Unhealthy at ANY Cost " ( my blog on Google) clearly points out that CoHousing is an excellent milieu for piloting a healthCARE delivery system that truly meets the needs of the communities---elderly and not-so-elderly, as all are underserved by the current health"care" ' system '. Even affording some healthcare providers some use of the Common House, eiither to remain onsite, in community, lodge ( at least part-time) to meet the needs of the frailer members of some communities would not only be ' cutting edge ' but surely better than the alternative, high-cost, low-quality ' system ' which is our now.
Would love some further discussion on this. (Dr.) Marty Sheehy ( M.D., MBA) Charles Maclean <advocate [at] philanthropynow.com> wrote: Fellow Cohousers, Heard somewhere that some communities may be buying a studio, leasing it to a health care provider at a reduced rate and having the professional provide some basic services in prevention and daily support to those aging in place and all to residents. Was asked by a fellow community member if providing that health care support would attract more people who were already frail? Anyone have experience with this option and the pros and cons? Thanks, Charles Maclean Charles.maclean [at] trillium-hollow.org _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
-
Subsidizing a health care provider on site - dose it attract the already frail? Charles Maclean, April 25 2006
-
Re: Subsidizing a health care provider on site - dose it attract the already frail? Martin Sheehy, April 25 2006
- Re: Subsidizing a health care provider on site - dose itattract the already frail? dahlen, April 25 2006
- Re: Subsidizing a health care provider on site - dose itattract the already frail? Martin Sheehy, April 26 2006
- Re: Subsidizing a health care provider on site - doseitattract the already frail? David L. Mandel, April 29 2006
- Re: Subsidizing a health care provider on site - doseitattract the already frail? Martin Sheehy, April 30 2006
-
Re: Subsidizing a health care provider on site - dose it attract the already frail? Martin Sheehy, April 25 2006
- Re: Subsidizing a health care provider on site - dose it attract the already frail? Sharon Villines, April 25 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.