Re: Spending Extra Money | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Dahako (Dahako![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 17:10:44 -0700 (PDT) |
Hi- I facilitate a lot of our financial decisions and for capital projects I like to do a variation on the budget party that sorts out project priorities, depth of support, and a relative value on spending v. not spending. First, Finance Team makes known the amount of money expected to be available without a special assessment, for capital improvements during the next 2-year cycle. We put up flip charts around the common dining room walls. At minimum, each sheet describes a capital project proposed by a team or individual including an estimated budget, who is the proposed project manager or contact, and at least one community value supported by the project. The project does not already have to have group consensus. At the bottom, the sheet is divided into 2 columns, A and B. Finance Team sponsors a sheet called "Spend No Money". I hand out 8 sticky notes to each household. On the top of each stack is written a dollar amount. This dollar amount equals one-eighth of the amount that household would have to pay to make ALL the proposed projects happen. (The formula to get the sticky note amount is (Total Cost of Proposed Capital Projects times the Household's Share of EVC Expenses) divided by 8. The Household's Share of EVC Expenses is in our condo documents and is a blend of percentage of total development square footage and a flat per-unit share.) We tell each household that spending each sticky represents the willingness on the part of their household for the community to spend that much of their household's contribution to our common funds on the project. The A column is for the first sticky a household puts on a project. The B column is for any subsequent stickies the same household "spends" on the project. Project backers stand near their sheets and hawk their projects (by any means fair or foul) as members of each household "spend" their "EVC bucks" on projects or on spending no money. We start this process in a meeting, but it can take a few days for members of a household to come to agreement and for all households to have a chance to project shop. Finance Team tapes down the stickies after each round. At the end, Finance Team does the grand count and announces how many households supported each project (the A column) and how deep the support was (the B column). That gives the community a pretty good idea of how to go forward. Any project with no support is dropped unless the Building Systems Team tells us we really need to do it to keep the building standing up or to meet our legal obligations. My recollection is that Spend No Money usually runs second or third. Faced with the idea of spending "real" money, many people decide we have it pretty good already without a lot of new bells and whistles. -Jessie Handforth Kome Eastern Village Cohousing Silver Spring, Maryland "Where I wish I had more money to spend on the common kitchen. :>) "
- Pathways [was Spending Extra Money], (continued)
-
Pathways [was Spending Extra Money] Sharon Villines, June 5 2006
- Re: Pathways [was Spending Extra Money] ken, June 5 2006
- Re: Pathways [was Spending Extra Money] Sharon Villines, June 5 2006
- Re: Pathways [was Spending Extra Money] Coreen Plewa, June 5 2006
-
Pathways [was Spending Extra Money] Sharon Villines, June 5 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.