Re: Reserve Studies | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 05:24:04 -0700 (PDT) |
On Aug 7, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Brian Bartholomew wrote:
Do you mean your plan is set up for investments that earn a net 6% after monetary inflation and taxes?
6% in the earnings column. Then that is offset by a separate inflation figure. Taxes are not part of the reserve study, I don't think.
This is a new company so we aren't set up for 6% now and I don't think we are earning that much. But that is what we were told the new company is using as a current figure.
I certainly like the goal of keeping the real estate in a roughly constant good condition, but I'm wondering if there are other ways to implement that goal that don't involve saving a pile of near-cash.
Good maintenance. Using materials that last longer, like tin roofs. That lowers reserve requirements but cash of some kind would still be required since our economy is based on it. Even if your community is off the grid, you would still need cash.
Sharon ----- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Reserve Studies, (continued)
- Re: Reserve Studies Robert Heinich, August 6 2006
- Re: Reserve Studies Brian Bartholomew, August 6 2006
- Re: Reserve Studies Sharon Villines, August 7 2006
- Re: Reserve Studies Brian Bartholomew, August 7 2006
- Re: Reserve Studies Sharon Villines, August 8 2006
- Re: Reserve Studies Sharon Villines, August 8 2006
- Re: Reserve Studies Jim Snyder-Grant, August 8 2006
- Re: Reserve Studies Rob Sandelin, August 8 2006
- Re: Reserve Studies Sharon Villines, August 8 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.