Common house permitting and Cities... | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lyle Scheer (wonko![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 09:34:48 -0700 (PDT) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 OK, OK, I know this is one of the common things, and rules are completely different from City to City. We're having some design/permitting issues with our Common house and the City of Ashland. We think we've convinced them that the building is not a "commercial" building, so we don't need an elevator to the 2nd floor for handicapped access or a commercial kitchen. They still believe it's a "public" building, and they are pushing for ADA (american disabilities act) compliance for the kitchen and the upstairs bathroom. This means special cooktop and lower counters for the kitchen and then because the only shower in the building is in the upstairs bathroom they still want it a handicapped shower (regardless that we won't have an elevator up there). Has anyone argued this successfully with your particular planning department (about the public/private and ADA)? If so, what arguments did you use? - - Lyle -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFCDLy00lQLawESXoRAxBYAJ0dgPMqDmKGI4MOgikftz92WRPe5ACeITob ecx/9BngVimbfcoZxALeq/A= =CSUS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Common house permitting and Cities... Lyle Scheer, September 13 2006
- Re: Common house permitting and Cities... Becky Weaver, September 13 2006
- Re: Common house permitting and Cities... Robert Heinich, September 13 2006
-
Re: Common house permitting and Cities... Laura Fitch, September 13 2006
- Re: Common house permitting and Cities... Lyle Scheer, September 13 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.