Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Brian Bartholomew (bb![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:03:25 -0700 (PDT) |
> That is a question only the Ontario Ministry of Energy can answer. So they're doing it, but nobody outside the MoE can tell why? If they're already 2/3 hydro and 1/4 nuke, maybe they're just doing it because it's fashionable, and it's actually a waste of resources. > It may be more costly to do it this way [...] In any case, it will > sure go a long way to making an RE system more affordable for > cohousing communities, and everyone. If it's more costly to do it that way, it will be LESS affordable. Brian
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay, (continued)
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay Amy D, October 13 2006
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay Lion Kuntz, October 13 2006
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay Brian Bartholomew, October 14 2006
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay Andrew Netherton, October 13 2006
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay Brian Bartholomew, October 14 2006
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay Lion Kuntz, October 13 2006
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay John Beutler, October 15 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.