| Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Brian Bartholomew (bb |
|
| Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:03:25 -0700 (PDT) | |
> That is a question only the Ontario Ministry of Energy can answer.
So they're doing it, but nobody outside the MoE can tell why? If
they're already 2/3 hydro and 1/4 nuke, maybe they're just doing it
because it's fashionable, and it's actually a waste of resources.
> It may be more costly to do it this way [...] In any case, it will
> sure go a long way to making an RE system more affordable for
> cohousing communities, and everyone.
If it's more costly to do it that way, it will be LESS affordable.
Brian
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay, (continued)
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay Amy D, October 13 2006
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay Lion Kuntz, October 13 2006
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay Brian Bartholomew, October 14 2006
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay Andrew Netherton, October 13 2006
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay Brian Bartholomew, October 14 2006
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay Lion Kuntz, October 13 2006
- Re: Making 'Clean Energy' Pay John Beutler, October 15 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.