Relative wealth | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: seniorcohousing (seniorcohousing![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:46:03 -0700 (PDT) |
In some of the earlier literature about cohousing, much was said about equality of units--that is, while yours might have three bedrooms for your passel of kids and mine is just a studio, the finish would be almost identical. I understand why this makes sense from a contractor's costs point of view--this isn't what my question is about. I'm wondering how important the SOCIAL ramifications of this is to a community. As someone PLANNING a community, I'm wondering if it would make so much difference now that some of us are a little older and one hopes wiser. I don't resent the fabulous water-view house of my stinking rich friend: but I sure do like sitting on her veranda. Nor do I snear at another friend's rental furnished with Salvation Army rejects. Can all three of us live in cohousing together, the wealthier choosing (or maybe not) to have a plusher finish to her unit, while our mutual friend might need some help with her downpayment and so will put up with the most basic finish? or will the differences in wealth in such a tight community cause friction? I don't want to live in a middle class ghetto. I'd really prefer the mixture of richer and poorer. But if the only way to do this is for the richer to live poorer, it's going to be a tough sell to some of our prospects. Nina, Ocean State CoHousing
-
Relative wealth seniorcohousing, October 15 2006
- Re: Relative wealth patjavcc, October 17 2006
- Re: Relative wealth Dave and Diane, October 17 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.