Re: development questions--again | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Diane L. Rose (dlrose![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:55:49 -0800 (PST) |
Depending upon the type of ownership structure and financing the New York Martin Act may apply. See sections 352-e and 359-e of the New York General Business Law and be sure to consult an attorney!!! Diane "Sharilyn Rediess" <sredies1@rochest To er.rr.com> "'Cohousing-L'" <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> cc 11/30/2006 02:02 PM Subject Re: [C-L]_ development questions--again Please respond to Cohousing-L <cohousing-l@coho using.org> So, as Catya said, "the lack of MONEY" in the arrangement--that means that the group has to come up with lots more up front money (to buy the land, have a significant investment to convince the bank to give you a construction loan) in addition to the other costs like legal fees, environmental evaluations, etc. Is that correct? If you can raise that kind of cash up front (through home equity loans, savings, beg, borrow [no stealing]), in the long run will the overall cost be lower in this model (sans development partner)? If any of my fellow New Yorkers are reading, is this type of a model more or less problematic under the Martin Act, or is in not relevant? Thanks! Shari -----Original Message----- From: Catya Belfer-Shevett [mailto:catya [at] homeport.org] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:18 PM To: Cohousing-L Subject: Re: [C-L]_ development questions--again That's about what we're doing (no GC yet) - the problem is the lack of MONEY in that arrangement. In terms of having qualified professionals, it's great. - catya, Mosaic Commons sredies1 [at] rochester.rr.com wrote: > Hello all, > > I am part of the forming Rochester Group and have been reading archives and > asking individuals (cohousing and local planners/architects) many questions > about the development process. Here is a question that I would appreciate > hearing thoughts on: One cohousing group I spoke with is using a > development model that includes a project manager, general contractor, and > architect as their primary development team. Is this approach the same as > what is typically called "self-development"? Or would this type of team > have enough professional expertise to avoid the pitfalls of > self-development that have been described on this list. From what I > understand, this type of model can be less expensive than having the usual > partnership with a developer. > > Our group understands the value of having experienced professionals who can > oversee the project (help keep it in budget), permitting, and handle many > of the development type decisions/tasks, etc. Can a project manager/GC > handle this as capably as a developer? > > Thanks for your patience in answering yet another development question. > Any thoughts would be appreciated. > > Shari Rediess > Rochester NY > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://mail2web.com/ . > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ ========== This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is private, confidential, or protected by attorney-client or other privilege. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify sender by reply e-mail, so that our records can be corrected. ==========
-
development questions--again sredies1 [at] rochester.rr.com, November 30 2006
-
Re: development questions--again Catya Belfer-Shevett, November 30 2006
-
Re: development questions--again Sharilyn Rediess, November 30 2006
- Re: development questions--again Laura Fitch, November 30 2006
- Re: development questions--again Diane L. Rose, November 30 2006
- Re: development questions--again Sharon Villines, November 30 2006
-
Re: development questions--again Sharilyn Rediess, November 30 2006
-
Re: development questions--again Catya Belfer-Shevett, November 30 2006
- Re: development questions--again Chris ScottHanson, December 3 2006
- Re: development questions--again Rod Lambert, November 30 2006
- Re: development questions--again Dave and Diane, December 1 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.