Re: not participating in consensus | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: byron patterson (byronpatterson![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 07:34:05 -0800 (PST) |
On 12/9/06, Byron Patterson^ byronpatterson [at] gmail.com My experience is that meetings that are allocated for decision making, must always be evaluated for the effectiveness of the process, which the the decision was made. Any tools that can be adopted by an organization that can better clarify the effectiveness of the decision process, would progress the organization. On 12/8/06, Catya Belfer-Shevett <catya [at] homeport.org> wrote:
> I think that they were frustrated with their own situations and preferred not to be part of a decision that allowed someone else to > get something they could not get themselves. I wonder if part of the solution needed to be a way of acknowledging that or crediting them somehow? - catya -- Catya Belfer-Shevett 'This is not the .sig you're looking for.' catya [at] pobox.com 'You can go about your business.' 'Move Along.' _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
-
not participating in consensus Leah, December 8 2006
- Re: not participating in consensus Rob Sandelin, December 8 2006
-
Re: not participating in consensus Catya Belfer-Shevett, December 8 2006
- Re: not participating in consensus byron patterson, December 9 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.