Re: 50+ and affordable | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Brian Bartholomew (bb![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 23:12:13 -0700 (PDT) |
Marganne <marganne [at] macnexus.org> writes: > I waver on the importance of environmentally friendliness. I *do* > want to walk gently on this earth and encourage others to do the > same. But I've seen projects where 'going green' substantially > boosted building expenses beyond what I can afford. Price in money, even with all its problems, is the best measure we have for environmental impact. Those newfangled green materials cost more resources to make. Spending $100K in green tech to save $40K in utility bill is not a net improvement. Not for your pocketbook, not for the environment. Walking gently means walking *cheap*. Brian
-
Re: 50+ and affordable Cindy T, June 29 2007
-
Re: 50+ and affordable Marganne, June 30 2007
- Re: 50+ and affordable Brian Bartholomew, June 30 2007
- Re: 50+ and affordable Lisa Poley, July 1 2007
- Re: 50+ and affordable Brian Bartholomew, July 2 2007
- Re: [C-L] Walking Lightly Lisa Poley, July 2 2007
- Re: [C-L] Walking Lightly Stuart Joseph, July 3 2007
-
Re: 50+ and affordable Marganne, June 30 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.