| Re: 50+ and affordable | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Brian Bartholomew (bb |
|
| Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 01:19:16 -0700 (PDT) | |
"Lisa Poley" <lpoley [at] vt.edu> writes:
> more commonly higher prices are seen with new technologies and
> innovations that have not yet been able to take advantage of the
> cost savings that come from scaled up production.
Right! Less economy of scale means more resources consumed to
build each unit.
> The higher 'resource' costs usually reflects higher priced labor
> inputs and initial R&D and capital outlays
Right! High-skill labor took a lot of resources (universities etc.)
to produce. Non-reoccuring engineering costs lots of resources.
Capital is or proxies for natural resources.
The resource costs of initial R&D and factory construction are just as
physically real as the costs of production after the product is
designed. If a product can't pay back its initial design investment
via income from sales, it is a net resource loss.
-----
Social justice is an entirely separate topic from counting resource
use. Slavery is an evil crime; the victims should be freed and the
slavemasters punished. That said, I do not think Wal-Mart suppliers
kill workers if they try to resign their jobs. If these jobs are
uniformly so horrible, why would people take them?
> Purchase of cheap goods imported from far away has significantly
> negative environmental impacts that are not well accounted for in
> the final price of the good because we don't currently internalize
> costs of the environment of CO2 emissions from transportation into
> the price of the goods we purchase.
The true resource cost of ocean shipping may be close to negligible
relative to the value of what's shipped:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/7.10/ports.html?pg=1&topic=&topic_set=
Today, transport costs account for about 1 percent of the
final price of consumer goods, making country of origin
largely an afterthought in purchasing decisions.
True, that 1% doesn't count air pollution. But it's a big ocean and
there may not be that much air pollution. How many harbors have a
smog problem?
Brian
-
Re: 50+ and affordable Cindy T, June 29 2007
-
Re: 50+ and affordable Marganne, June 30 2007
-
Re: 50+ and affordable Brian Bartholomew, June 30 2007
- Re: 50+ and affordable Lisa Poley, July 1 2007
- Re: 50+ and affordable Brian Bartholomew, July 2 2007
- Re: [C-L] Walking Lightly Lisa Poley, July 2 2007
- Re: [C-L] Walking Lightly Stuart Joseph, July 3 2007
- Re: [C-L] Walking Lightly Kerry Strayton, July 3 2007
-
Re: 50+ and affordable Brian Bartholomew, June 30 2007
-
Re: 50+ and affordable Marganne, June 30 2007
- Re: 50+ and affordable Ruthpoet, June 29 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.