Re: Public access to sewer and water?
From: Karen Carlson (kcarlson2wisc.edu)
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
Personally, I'd look for opportunities to infill rather than building on virgin land. Communities as close as possible to all the services members need means less dependence on cars. This would answer your question about sewer & water.
Karen Carlson


April wrote:
Hi all -
I was wondering if some of you could speak to the trade-off between purchasing land with 
access to public water and sewer, versus purchasing land that requires its own wells and 
septic systems?  I know this might be hard to do, as I assume the costs vary across 
states, but the argument I've been hearing is that it is incredibly expensive to purchase 
raw land without access to either service, and so the high cost of locating within 
distance to these community services is "worth it".

I guess I just would like to know where the threshold is - there's got to be 
numbers associated with these two things, such that a property can be so 
inexpensive that it would outweigh the potential benefit of locating within 
access to public water and sewer.  Anyway, I'm sure some of you must have 
debated this before us, so I am hoping you might have some insight, despite the 
fact that there are so few of us in New York State.

Thanks (for this and the numerous other helpful responses I've gotten over the 
past half year)!
April

April Roggio
Capital District Eco-housing in Albany, NY
~ a sustainable cohousing community in the making! ~
www.cdecohousing.org info [at] cdecohousing.org
Next business meeting is on August 12th, 1pm - email me for directions!
_________________________________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/





Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.