Revisiting Consensus | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:35:01 -0700 (PDT) |
Joel Plotkin <joel.plotkin [at] sunyit.edu> is the author of the message below. It was posted by Fred the Cohousing-L list manager <fholson [at] cohousing.org> since it was sent in html only which the list does not handle. We are working on finding a way for Joel to send plain text. Fred -------------------- FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS -------------------- COHOrts: A question regarding consensus--Our community uses consensus as our decision-making process, with CT Butler's essay as a guideline. A question arose yesterday about revisiting an issue on which consensus had been reached several years ago. The more procedurally-oriented of us (still hearing crackles, perhaps, from remaining synapses of Roberts' Rules of Order) wanted first to reach consensus on a proposal to revisit the earlier consensus. Others said that simply reopening discussion was an implicit agreement to revisit the earlier consensus, but that without a new consensus, the old decision stands. This last is what Butler writes in his essay. It seems to me, in the light of the morning, that trying to arrive at a consensus to revisit an earlier consensus is inherently virtually impossible, given that some members have already expressed some disaffection with the earlier decision; that not agreeing to revisit the issue undemocratically silences those who wish to reopen the discussion. Our group has decided to continue work on the issue in a smaller group (a traditional consensus next-step), implicitly acknowledging that the earlier consensus IS being revisited, without a formal proposal to revisit. So here's where I'd like input: Do any of the consensus-based or sociocracy groups have language about revisiting earlier consensi (consensuses? consensim?) or experience that may help a group with very varied backgrounds in consensus better understand this issue. A further question: the issue at question is that our current Rules and Regulations require members of the Community Owners Association to be partners in our tree farm business venture, a separately-incorporated LLC. Those Coho groups with attached or covalent businesses--how do you handle the issue of a COA member not wishing to be joined legally to that business? Joel Plotkin Hundredfold Farm Orrtanna, PA
-
Re: Revisiting Consensus Raines Cohen, December 24 1999
- Revisiting Consensus Fred H Olson, September 10 2007
-
Re: Revisiting Consensus dahako, September 10 2007
- Re: Revisiting Consensus Rob Sandelin, September 11 2007
- Re: Revisiting Consensus Sharon Villines, September 10 2007
- Re: Revisiting Consensus Mac Thomson, September 11 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.