Re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: O3C11N6G (normangauss![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:26:23 -0700 (PDT) |
Thanks Maura:The law in California requires a vote by the full membership for any change in description of the property. I have pointed this out to the people in question, but their position is that if their lawyer says it's OK to act unilaterally, that is OK with them. I believe that this change needs to be recorded in the county recorders office.
I feel that the lawyer needs to brush up on Common Interest Development law. She does not advertise herself as a condominium lawyer, so I expect that her expertise in this kind of law is limited.
Since the lawyer is being paid out of community funds, I feel that she is representing me as well as the members of the sub-group and HOA. I have presented my concern to the whole community, including members of the Board, and have received only disagreement with my interpretation of the law. I wonder if sending her a letter pointing out the law would do any good.
Norm Gauss
-
Re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19 maura deering, September 20 2007
- Re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19 O3C11N6G, September 20 2007
-
Changing common elements Rob Sandelin, September 20 2007
-
Re: Changing common elements O3C11N6G, September 20 2007
- Re: Changing common elements Brian Bartholomew, September 20 2007
- Re: Changing common elements O3C11N6G, September 20 2007
-
Re: Changing common elements O3C11N6G, September 20 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.