Re: Some life and cohousing advise | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: balaji (balaji![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:56:49 -0700 (PDT) |
Robert is absolutely correct, and indeed, his view is in accord with everything we know from studying community. I'm a cultural anthropologist, and I've done fieldwork for thirty years in India, mostly, and in Japan. Communities "work" because humans are adapted for cooperation. They are disagreemens, to be sure, but the long-term effect of conflict resolution is usually to strengthen community bonds. When exceptions occur, it is because of peculiar or aberrant conditions; some would say the period of industrialization in the West constitutes one such aberrant condition. If Richard Heinberg and others are correct, we are going to have to relearn the skills the rest of the world never forgot -- skills of living and working in community. The good news is that we are genetically prepared for this kind of adaptation. Cohousing is just another road "back to the village." I look forward to making the journey. Best, Charles Nuckolls P.S. Our community in formation is called "Utah Valley Cohousing Community" and can be found on the Yahoo disucssion site.
- Re: Changing common elements, (continued)
- Re: Changing common elements Sharon Villines, September 21 2007
- Re: Changing common elements O3C11N6G, September 21 2007
- Re: Changing common elements Alexander Robin A, September 21 2007
- Some life and cohousing advise Rob Sandelin, September 22 2007
- Re: Some life and cohousing advise balaji, September 22 2007
- Re: Some life and cohousing advise Tim & Lisa Gregg, September 24 2007
- Heinberg and Peak Oil O3C11N6G, September 25 2007
- Re: Some life and cohousing advise Chris ScottHanson, September 23 2007
- Re: Changing common elements Sharon Villines, September 22 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.