Re: Quantifying the value of community | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Robert Heinich (robert![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:11:36 -0700 (PDT) |
Quoting Elizabeth Magill <pastorliz [at] verizon.net>:
Recently, folks were willing (and paid) a premium for the smaller A house ... this was even more amazing as this was at a time at the start of falling house market.I'm willing to pay a premium for community, and I'm willing to ignore the falling house market. But what happened with the appraisals on those homes, and how did that affect getting a mortgage? Was the appraiser willing to increase the value of the home because there were people who wanted to buy it at that price? Or because of the community that came with it?
Not quite. Although appraisers are getting better at including the Common House, The Barn, the PlayStructure and about 8 acres of common land in the value of a house, they did not add a bump for the surrounding community. (As cohousing sales have more of a history, this may change.) I believe the appraisals was less than the asking price so the buyers needed to put up additional cash in order to buy the house. -Robert Heinich Eno Commons Cohousing Neighborhood www.enocommons.org Durham, NC where Sunday is the Peter Pan Operetta rehearsal (part of the preparation for EnoWeen). Have you prepared your EnoWeen goodie bag?
- Local Job Market as a Factor, (continued)
- Local Job Market as a Factor O3C11N6G, September 28 2007
-
Re: Quantifying the value of community Robert Heinich, September 27 2007
- Re: Quantifying the value of community Elizabeth Magill, September 27 2007
- Re: Quantifying the value of community Lynn Nadeau, September 27 2007
- Re: Quantifying the value of community Robert Heinich, September 28 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.