Re: How is "cheap" green? / "rehashing" | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ed and/or Kathryn Belzer (belzer![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:31:01 -0800 (PST) |
This seems to me to be a fair compromise. Certainly it is easy
enough to click on the provided path to see what has already been
said and then consider one's response in that light.
Kathryn Belzer Chaswood Cohousing Nova Scotia On 12-Jan-08, at 4:21 PM, Tim Mensch wrote:
Here's the link again (it's from back before the "Please trim your tails"headers, and has most of the relevant previous messages quoted at the end).http://lists.cohousing.org/pipermail/cohousing-l/msg26261.html
- Re: How is "cheap" green? / "rehashing", (continued)
- Re: How is "cheap" green? / "rehashing" Racheli Gai, January 12 2008
- Re: How is "cheap" green? / "rehashing" Sharon Villines, January 12 2008
- Re: How is "cheap" green? / "rehashing" Racheli Gai, January 12 2008
- Re: How is "cheap" green? / "rehashing" Tim Mensch, January 12 2008
- Re: How is "cheap" green? / "rehashing" Ed and/or Kathryn Belzer, January 12 2008
- Re: How is "cheap" green? - A correction. Racheli Gai, January 12 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.