Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:45:52 -0800 (PST) |
On Jan 16, 2008, at 11:56 AM, James Kacki wrote:
The desirability of brevity notwithstanding, I read every message that comes through (not digest mode) and personally I'm having trouble piecing together the threads of conversations since we've de- tailed. It used to be quite clear and interesting reading the days posting
Some email programs will create theaded messages for you. I think if you read at the website, you can select threaded messages.
The thread is always based on the the subject line.Several conversations at the same time are a characteristic of email lists, particularly ones with 1000+ subscribers.
List Moderator ---- TakomaDC [at] yahoogroups.com Where everyone trims their tails!
-
Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" Monty Berman, January 16 2008
-
Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" James Kacki, January 16 2008
- Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" Sharon Villines, January 16 2008
-
Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" James Kacki, January 16 2008
- Fwd: Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" Marcia J. Bates, January 16 2008
- Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" Rebecca Reid, January 16 2008
-
Fwd: Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" David Heimann, January 16 2008
- Re: Fwd: Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" Sharon Villines, January 17 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.