Re: Large animal policies | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (racheli![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:32:31 -0800 (PST) |
hmm, raising animals or crops might not always save money (people
sometimes
give up on lucrative jobs to do what seems like a more meaningful way
to live),
- and should be taken seriously regardless of whether money-saving
occurs or is
the goal. Racheli. On Feb 2, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Sharon Villines wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008, at 11:14 AM, John Beutler wrote:Our society devalues anything that doesn't return cash.Another way of defining a non-hobby in money terms would be something that _saves_ you money, which your animal raising does. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines http://www.sociocracy.info _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Re: Large animal policies, (continued)
- Re: Large animal policies Craig Ragland, February 1 2008
- Re: Large animal policies Ed and/or Kathryn Belzer, February 1 2008
- Message not available
- Re: Large animal policies John Beutler, February 2 2008
- Re: Large animal policies Sharon Villines, February 2 2008
- Re: Large animal policies Racheli Gai, February 2 2008
- Resales Richard L Kohlhaas, February 4 2008
- Re: Resales Sharon Villines, February 4 2008
- Re: Resales Craig Ragland, February 4 2008
- Re: Large animal policies Ed and/or Kathryn Belzer, February 2 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.