Re: Cohousing California legislative alert
From: James Kacki (jimkackimts.net)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
As an aside, I can't see 'rogue' solar panels being too much of an issue, but I could easily wind turbines with the noise and visual agitation/pollution, could be a big issue for a community.
James

On 10-Apr-08, at 8:24 PM, John Faust wrote:


"From the  description, I can't tell why the bills are offensive. "

Nor can I. We need to acknowledge the importance of our community and we do that through a consensus process in our decision making. But we do have moral imperatives that transcend community. One of those is the health of the planet and the desperate need to reduce fossil fuel consumption. If 45 days isn't enough time to offer an equally effective alternative to solar
panels, then the community hasn't been thinking about the problem and
shouldn't be allowed to stand in the way. If the community has a viable alternative, then 45 days is surely enough time to dissuade a member from acting unilaterally. In fact, the threat of unilateral action may stimulate
communities to actually grapple with this dire
problem<http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v452/n7187/full/ 452531a.html>
.

John Faust
_________________________________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/




Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.