Re: Required handicap access to 2nd floor/elevator | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Stuart Joseph (stuart![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 06:28:48 -0700 (PDT) |
In our town, a common house is considered public. I assume that it is
the case in most places, especially since the building is shared by the
community. I would check with the American Disabilities act or your
architect.
As a handicapped person, I am disturbed by the thought of folks not taking my needs into account and discriminating against me to save a few dollars. It would also dissuade me from joining the community, even if I weren't handicapped. By not installing a lift, you would be preventing me from using the multi-purpose room. If the bedrooms are for guests, what would happen if I had handicapped friends that wanted to visit or do something in the multi-purpose room?
How would a handicapped person do their laundry if it is in the basement and there was no lift?
Are you planning to make the doors to meet the ADA standards?These days, you don't need a full blown elevator between floors, there are lifts available that are very reasonable in cost. It is always easier and cheaper to do things during construction rather than retro-fitting it if the laws, or uses of the space, do change in the future.
Are your houses being planned for handicapped accessibility or the option to do so?
I am very passionate about this and I would really consider it discrimination, but there is also a dollars and sense consideration, not only on installation costs, but you are cutting off potential members from joining your group.
My $.02.. maryvk [at] tellink.net wrote:
GreetingsWe are working hard to control costs on our Common House for our new community so we can have what we want but be able to build it this spring. Our design has our bedrooms on the second floor along with a multipurpose room. Basement has laundry and storage only. First floor has a handicap bathroom. We'd like not to put in an elevator or even the shaft for future use. Must we do this? Are Common Houses typically treated like one's private home or a public building with required handicap features? Thoughts and lessons learned? Your prompt reply is appreciated and thank you for your help. Mary Kaplan Nubanusit Farm and Neighborhood Peterborough NH _________________________________________________________________Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/No virus found in this incoming message Checked by PC Tools AntiVirus (4.0.0.26 - 10.072.004). http://www.pctools.com/free-antivirus/
-- Stuart Joseph, 802-463-1954 36 Front St. Bellows Falls, Vermont, 05101 USA http://www.caercoburn.org No virus found in this outgoing message Checked by PC Tools AntiVirus (4.0.0.26 - 10.072.004). http://www.pctools.com/free-antivirus/
- Re: Elevators and exclusions, (continued)
- Re: Elevators and exclusions Tim Mensch, May 19 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions Ellen Keyne Seebacher, May 9 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions John Faust, May 9 2008
- Re: Elevators and exclusions Sharon Villines, May 9 2008
- Re: Required handicap access to 2nd floor/elevator Sharon Villines, May 8 2008
- Re: Required handicap access to 2nd floor/elevator Matthew Whiting, May 8 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.